<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE</title>
  <link>http://www.americanintelligence.us/</link>
  <description>AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:52:41 GMT</pubDate>
  <ttl>1440</ttl>
  <generator>CPG-Nuke Dragonfly</generator>
  <copyright>AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE</copyright>
  <category>News</category>
  <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
  

<item>
  <title>SECRET WORLD OF IFE</title>
  <link>http://www.americanintelligence.us/News/article/sid=5758.html</link>
  <description>On Whitechapel Road in the heart of the East End stands the East London Mosque. 

For most of the 15,000 ordinary Muslims who pray there each week, it is simply a place of worship. For many, it provides valuable social facilities, and creche and outreach services. 

But for a small number, the mosque is the headquarters of a secretive, fundamentalist political network. The Islamic Forum of Europe is dedicated, in its own words, to changing the “very infrastructure of society, its institutions, its culture, its political order and its creed … from ignorance to Islam”. 

The mosque and IFE are inextricably intertwined. Dr Mohammed Abdul Bari, the chairman of the mosque, and its vice-chairman are former IFE presidents. 

The director and imam of the mosque are trustees of the group. Of 22 IFE trustees in recent years, only five have not also been trustees or officeholders of the religious centre. 

The mosque calls the IFE a “social welfare organisation” and the IFE presents itself as committed to “community cohesion” and “tolerance”.</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:52:41 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
  <title>MONETARY THREAT TO OUR NATIONAL SECURITY</title>
  <link>http://www.americanintelligence.us/News/article/sid=5757.html</link>
  <description>Despite recent government reports that China&#039;s holdings of U.S. Treasury debt declined during the second half of last year, the Asian economic giant almost certainly owns far more Treasury securities than official statistics indicate. 

After peaking at $801.5 billion, China&#039;s holdings of U.S. Treasury securities declined to $755.4 billion at the year&#039;s end, dropping the communist power into the position of second-largest holder of Treasury debt after Japan&#039;s $768.8 billion, official government data reveal. 

But these numbers don&#039;t tell the whole story. 

&quot;The U.S. Treasury data almost certainly understate Chinese holdings of our government debt because [the U.S. figures] do not reveal the ultimate country of ownership when [debt] instruments are held through an intermediary in another jurisdiction,&quot; Simon Johnson, an economics professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, a bipartisan forum established by Congress in 2000 to monitor the security implications of the U.S. economic relationship with China.</description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:44:26 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
  <title>IRAN EXPELS RUSSIAN PILOTS</title>
  <link>http://www.americanintelligence.us/News/article/sid=5756.html</link>
  <description>Iran has given Russian commercial pilots working in the Islamic Republic two months to leave the country as it has no need for them, Transport Minister Hamid Behbahani was quoted as saying on Saturday. 

The move is a further sign of strains between Iran and Russia, which has indicated it could back new sanctions against Tehran over its disputed nuclear work. For its part, Iran has voiced frustration over Moscow&#039;s failure to deliver a defense missile system.
 
Iran&#039;s semi-official Fars News Agency said the idea to order the Russian pilots to leave the country gained momentum after a Russian-made aircraft caught fire as it landed in northeastern Iran in January, injuring more than 40 people. 

The plane belonged to Iran&#039;s Taban airline but the pilot was Russian, Fars said. It did not say how many Russians currently worked as pilots for Iranian airlines.
 
&quot;Upon an order from the president (Mahmoud Ahmadinejad), the Road and Transport Ministry has set a two-month deadline, upon the expiry of which all Russian pilots will have to leave the country,&quot; Behbahani said.</description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:04:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
  <title>NYC TERROR TRIALS UNCERTAIN</title>
  <link>http://www.americanintelligence.us/News/article/sid=5755.html</link>
  <description>President Obama&#039;s advisers are nearing a recommendation that Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, be prosecuted in a military tribunal, administration officials said, a step that would reverse Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.&#039;s plan to try him in civilian court in New York City. 

The president&#039;s advisers feel increasingly hemmed in by bipartisan opposition to a federal trial in New York and demands, mainly from Republicans, that Mohammed and his accused co-conspirators remain under military jurisdiction, officials said. While Obama has favored trying some terrorism suspects in civilian courts as a symbol of U.S. commitment to the rule of law, critics have said military tribunals are the appropriate venue for those accused of attacking the United States. 

If Obama accepts the likely recommendation of his advisers, the White House may be able to secure from Congress the funding and legal authority it needs to close the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and replace it with a facility within the United States. The administration has failed to meet a self-imposed one-year deadline to close Guantanamo.</description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
  <title>RESOLUTION ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE PASSED</title>
  <link>http://www.americanintelligence.us/News/article/sid=5754.html</link>
  <description>WASHINGTON — The House Foreign Affairs Committee on Thursday narrowly approved an Armenian genocide resolution over last-minute objections by the Obama administration.

After an extended debate that awoke many old ghosts, the committee approved the resolution by 23-22. The measure would put the House of Representatives on record as applying the word &quot;genocide&quot; to a man-made catastrophe in which, by some estimates, 1.5 million Armenians died from 1915 to 1923 during the final days of the Ottoman Empire.

&quot;I don&#039;t pretend to be a professional historian,&quot; said committee Chairman Rep. Howard Berman , D- Calif. , &quot;but the vast majority of experts agree that the tragic massacre of Armenians constitutes a genocide.&quot;

The nine-page resolution says that &quot;the failure of the domestic and international authorities to punish those responsible for the Armenian genocide is a reason why similar genocides have recurred and may recur in the future.&quot;</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:33:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
  <title>Cyber Crime FBI Intelligence Units</title>
  <link>http://www.americanintelligence.us/News/article/sid=5753.html</link>
  <description>Everyone should be aware of the recent (5-10 yrs mostly, some before that) serious cyber-threats to U.S. Security.   This week FBI Director Mueller spoke at the RSA Conference in SFO.  His thoughts were interesting, since much of what he could have said had to remain unsaid.  One glimpse regarded online banking intrusions of a massive nature.   What he was able to speak publicly about was interesting from an intelligence gathering stance.

Anyway, here is the general thoughts, the link follows.
FBI Director Robert Mueller on RSA Cyber Security Conference, March 4, 2010, SFO USA.

The entire text is at link below, and is worth the read.


	Quote::

	...There has been much discussion of late about which nation-states pose the greatest danger of cyber attack. And to a certain extent, that discussion is irrelevant. It may not matter who the attacker is, or whether the motivation is political, ideological, or financial. The information may be bought and sold by anyone, anywhere in the world, whether friend or foe.
The end result will be the same: we will lose our data. We may lose access to our own information. And we may well lose our security. ......  We have seen not only a loss of data, but also corruption of that data. We are concerned with the integrity of your source code. If hackers made subtle, undetected changes to your code, they would have a permanent window into everything you do. The same is true for those with access to hardware and software in the global supply chain.......... Some in the industry have likened this to “death by a thousand cuts.” We are bleeding data, intellectual property, information, and source code, bit by bit, and in some cases, terabyte by terabyte.
The solution does not rest solely with better ways to detect and block intrusion attempts. We are playing the cyber equivalent of cat and mouse, and, unfortunately, the mouse seems to be one step ahead.
We must work to find those responsible. And we must make the cost of doing business more than they are willing to bear....
  I&#039;m positive that Director Mueller&#039;s idea of &#039;making the cost more than they can bear&#039;, is much more gentlemanly than my ideas are.  
The speech is at this link: www.fbi.gov/pressrel/s...030410.htm</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:32:25 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
  <title>REMEMBER THE ALAMO!</title>
  <link>http://www.americanintelligence.us/News/article/sid=5752.html</link>
  <description>February 23 marks the anniversary of the beginning of the battle of the Alamo back in 1836. For more than 13 days, 186 brave and determined patriots withstood Santa Anna&#039;s seasoned army of over 4,000 troops. To a man, the defenders of that mission fort knew they would never leave those ramparts alive. They had several opportunities to leave and live. Yet, they chose to fight and die. How foolish they must look to this generation of spoiled Americans.

It is difficult to recall that stouthearted men such as Davy Crockett (a nationally known frontiersman and former congressman), Will Travis (only 23 years old with a little baby at home), and Jim Bowie (a wealthy landowner with properties on both sides of the Rio Grande) really existed. These were real men with real dreams and real desires. Real blood flowed through their veins. They loved their families and enjoyed life as much as any of us do. There was something different about them, however. They possessed a commitment to liberty that transcended personal safety and comfort.

Liberty is an easy word to say, but it is a hard word to live up to. Freedom has little to do with financial gain or personal pleasure. Accompanying Freedom is her constant and unattractive companion, Responsibility. Neither is she an only child. Patriotism and Morality are her sisters. They are inseparable: destroy one and all will die.

Early in the siege, Travis wrote these words to the people of Texas: &quot;Fellow Citizens &amp; Compatriots: I am besieged by a thousand or more of the Mexicans under Santa Anna. . . . The enemy has demanded a surrender at discretion, otherwise the garrison are to be put to the sword . . . I have answered the demand with a cannon shot &amp; our flag still waves proudly from the walls. I shall never surrender or retreat. . . . VICTORY OR DEATH! P.S. The Lord is on our side. . . .&quot;</description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:57:18 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
  <title>ISRAEL/US DIFFER ON IRAN STANCE</title>
  <link>http://www.americanintelligence.us/News/article/sid=5751.html</link>
  <description>Israel&#039;s perspective on Iran&#039;s nuclear program differs from that of the United States, and the two may part ways on what action to take, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said on Friday.

Washington&#039;s clout over its Middle East ally is under scrutiny after Israel&#039;s veiled threats to attack Iran preemptively if international diplomacy fails to rein in Tehran&#039;s uranium enrichment, a process with bomb-making potential.

The United States this week said it did not want to hurt the Iranian people with &quot;crippling&quot; sanctions against Iran&#039;s energy sector, measures Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has described as the only viable diplomatic solution.

&quot;There is of course a certain difference in perspective and a difference in judgment and a difference in the internal clock, a difference in capabilities,&quot; Barak told the Washington Institute for Near East Policy think-tank, when asked about Israeli-U.S. discussions about Iran.

&quot;I don&#039;t think that there is a need to coordinate in this regard. There should be understanding on the exchange of views, but we do not need to coordinate everything,&quot; said Barak, who was in Washington for strategic talks.</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:52:01 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
  <title>VDH NAILS IT AGAIN</title>
  <link>http://www.americanintelligence.us/News/article/sid=5750.html</link>
  <description>Here are a few things that I think don’t quite compute.

a)    The now familiar Palin/Edwards dichotomy. John McCain was damned for picking Sarah Palin who had not finished her first term as governor, and had previously only been elected to local political offices and served on a state commission.

Her middle American ‘you betcha’ twang, NASCAR persona, good looks, and occasional deer-in-the-headlines interviews with hostile anchor people, coupled with the kids, conservative creed, Christianity, and 19th century husband, sickened—there is no other word for it— the DC-New York punditocracy. Yes, they concluded, she really was from Wasilla. Yuk.

So we got everything in the media from the maverick McCain suddenly as cynical sell-out who settled for third-best, to Palin, the clueless Alaskan yokel.

In contrast, to this day, there is no in-depth analysis of Kerry’s disastrous pick of the first-term, uninformed Senator Edwards as his VP choice in 2004. And it took the National Enquirer to inform us of his later conspiratorial lying and bribery involving his illegitimate child—sordid facts apparently well known to—and hushed up by—the mainstream media. Remember, later presidential candidate Edwards was not just inexperienced, but as a confessed wonk, did not open a book. He was the owner of a mansion who preached about “two-nations” inequality, and he alternately used and humiliated his alternately heroic and conniving cancer-stricken spouse.

b)  The responsible Times.  For much of 2002-8, the New York Times leaked classified information about U.S. policy in the war on terror and gave up on Iraq (though John Burns, its military correspondent, was quite professional and courageous). Indeed, the serial story of Iraq was the IED, not the heroic capture of Fallujah or the stunning success of the surge. The Times gave a discount to Moveon.org to run its “General Betray-Us” ads at a time thousands of young Americans were fighting for their lives during the surge.

And now? The Times admirably sat on advanced warning of the current NATO offensive in Afghanistan; its editor emphasized that the paper was “responsible” in reporting matters of national security (i.e. the Times does not leak). Our current efforts in Helmand Province now are portrayed in the media in the manner of Patton’s WWII offensives—thank God for that.

c)   The war on terror.  For much of the Bush administration, one would have thought the Constitution had been shredded. My God—Tribunals! Renditions! Guantanamo! Patriot Act! Intercepts! Wiretaps! Iraq! Predator drones!

Indeed, for each of those ACLU talking points, then candidate Obama reflected the media outrage and damned these protocols. Yet suddenly, there is no in-depth critical analysis of these policies. Most are now kept and apparently thought by government and media to be of both utility and morality by virtue that Obama adopted them.

In some cases, rhetoric suffices.  Guantanamo is now  “virtually” closed, in the manner KSM will be virtually tried in New York. Assert rather than enact and a sort of virtual nirvana follows in the media.

Not long ago, we were to charge or investigate former administration and CIA officials for ordering the waterboarding of three confessed terrorists, among them Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the proud father of 9/11. And now? The number of Predator drone assassination missions has increased enormously. Apparently in this new age of war as a criminal justice matter, somehow the Bush-era coerced interrogations of confessed mass-murderers deserved popular outrage and were to be considered crimes, while the judge/jury/executioner sentences passed down on suspected terrorists (again, dead men need no Miranda rights)—and anyone in their general vicinity when the hellfire missile hits—are well, like renditions and tribunals, suddenly problematic.</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:44:54 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
  <title>MEIR DAGAN&#039;S MOSSAD</title>
  <link>http://www.americanintelligence.us/News/article/sid=5749.html</link>
  <description>IN early January two black Audi A6 limousines drove up to the main gate of a building on a small hill in the northern suburbs of Tel Aviv: the headquarters of Mossad, the Israeli secret intelligence agency, known as the “midrasha”.

Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, stepped out of his car and was greeted by Meir Dagan, the 64-year-old head of the agency. Dagan, who has walked with a stick since he was injured in action as a young man, led Netanyahu and a general to a briefing room.

According to sources with knowledge of Mossad, inside the briefing room were some members of a hit squad. As the man who gives final authorisation for such operations, Netanyahu was briefed on plans to kill Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, a member of Hamas, the militant Islamic group that controls Gaza.

Mossad had received intelligence that Mabhouh was planning a trip to Dubai and they were preparing an operation to assassinate him there, off-guard in a luxury hotel. The team had already rehearsed, using a hotel in Tel Aviv as a training ground without alerting its owners.</description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:41:55 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
